I always check the graph at the end, lots of openings this week with DM arriving of course.
I saw the note about GG registrations only and the graph looks a little different. What changed exactly? If people open and scan an FFG deck like CotA does it not get counted?
The decks still get counted in the Master Vault numbers, but the weekly graph will only show GG registrations from here on out. The number of decks from FFG sets has seen a significant decline over the past year, and it seems that the GG-only graph provides a better "state of the game" view than looking at the entirety of the vault. Or to put it another way, the "total registrations" graph makes it difficult to see what is happening with regards to the more actively registered sets.
Thanks for the issue!
I always check the graph at the end, lots of openings this week with DM arriving of course.
I saw the note about GG registrations only and the graph looks a little different. What changed exactly? If people open and scan an FFG deck like CotA does it not get counted?
The decks still get counted in the Master Vault numbers, but the weekly graph will only show GG registrations from here on out. The number of decks from FFG sets has seen a significant decline over the past year, and it seems that the GG-only graph provides a better "state of the game" view than looking at the entirety of the vault. Or to put it another way, the "total registrations" graph makes it difficult to see what is happening with regards to the more actively registered sets.
K, gotcha! And I've often thought similar.
Maybe it's worth having two graphs? The recent graph and then below the full graph for context?